Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Journal of Southern Medical University ; (12): 712-714, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-360200

ABSTRACT

Between March, 2016 and January, 2017, 53 patients underwent robotic-assisted esophagectomy with triple incisions. All the patients were intubated with Double lumen endotracheal tub with one-lung ventilation and COpneumoperitoneum, and COpneumothorax was used in 7 cases. Most of the patients could tolerate OLV and COpneumoperitoneum, and 4 patients with COpneumothorax had hypoxemia and required double-lung ventilation or high frequency ventilation; 15 patients developed postoperative pulmonary complications and were transferred to ICU. These results suggest that COpneumothorax during robotic-assisted esophagectomy with triple incision seriously disturbs pulmonary function, and careful anesthesia management is essential for preventing complications.

2.
Journal of Southern Medical University ; (12): 1857-1859, 2010.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-330822

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the effect and hemodynamics of sevoflurane(SEV) and propofol (PRO) in combined anesthesia induction with remifentanil for tracheal intubation fibreoptic bronchoscope (FOB).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Twenty-four patients without difficult airway undergoing elective surgery with tracheal intubation general anesthesia were randomly divided into SEV and PRO group. FOB intubation was performed with sevoflurane or propofol administration combined with remifentanil induction. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), SPO2 and Narcotrend index (NI) were monitored to evaluate the anesthetic depth during the induction. The time to loss of consciousness (LOC), intubation time, intubation score, anesthetic dosage and adverse effects were recorded.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>No significant difference was found between the two groups in the time to LOC, intubation time, intubation score, remifentanil dosage. Intubation was performed successfully in both groups. BP and HR of both groups decreased after the induction and did not increase after the intubation, with variation within the normal range. No significant difference in BP and HR was found between the two groups. NI of both groups decreased after the induction and during intubation. NI of SEV group 2 min after intubation was higher than that of PRO group. There was no significant difference in NI between the two groups at the other time points. No significant adverse effects or recall of the intubation procedure were reported.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Anesthesia induction FOB intubation with sevoflurane and propofol, both in combination with remifentanil, can be applied in surgical patients without contraindications to general anesthesia, and both methods can provide fast induction and good intubation condition with stable hemodynamics.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Humans , Middle Aged , Anesthesia , Methods , Anesthetics, Inhalation , Therapeutic Uses , Anesthetics, Intravenous , Therapeutic Uses , Bronchoscopes , Hemodynamics , Intubation, Intratracheal , Methods , Methyl Ethers , Therapeutic Uses , Piperidines , Therapeutic Uses , Propofol , Therapeutic Uses
3.
Journal of Southern Medical University ; (12): 313-315, 2009.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-338999

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>a To observe the analgesic effect of fentanyl combined with flurbiprofen axetil for postoperative analgesia after gynecologic surgery.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>One hundred and forty patients undergoing gynecologic surgery were randomized equally into two groups to receive postoperative patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with fentanyl (1.6-1.8 mg) plus tropisetron (5 mg/100 ml) (group I), or with fentanyl (0.8-1.0 mg) and flurbiprofen axetil (200 mg) plus tropisetron (5 mg/100 ml) (group II), at the PCIA rate of 2 ml/h, bolus dose of 1 ml, and lock time of 15 min. At 6 h (T1), 12 h (T2), 24 h (T3), and 48 h (T4) after the operation, the analgesic effect was evaluated with the Prine-Henry score (PHS), and the side effects were recorded. The coagulation function of the patients was assessed with thrombelastography before (T0) and 48 h (T4) after the operation, and the time of gastrointestinal function recovery was recorded.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The fentanyl dose was significantly less in group II than in group I (P<0.05). At the time points of T1 and T2, the PHS in group II was significantly lower than that in group I (P<0.05), but comparable between the two groups at T3 and T4 (P>0.05). Significant higher incidences of the adverse effects such as nausea, dizziness and lethargy was noted in group I than in group II (P<0.05). Compared with that at T0, the parameter K was significantly delayed at T4 in both groups (P<0.05). The two groups showed similar time of gastrointestinal function recovery after the operation (P>0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Flurbiprofen axetil combined with fentanyl for postoperative analgesia can significantly reduce fentanyl dose and the incidence of adverse effects associated with fentanyl without obviously affecting the coagulation and gastrointestinal functions.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Analgesics, Opioid , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Drug Synergism , Fentanyl , Flurbiprofen , Genital Neoplasms, Female , General Surgery , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures , Pain, Postoperative , Drug Therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL